PDA

View Full Version : Mitchell Sargent sacked for cocaine !!!!!



parramatta_eels_123
24-08-2006, 06:20 PM
NRL star tests positive to cocaine

EXCLUSIVE by James Hooper

NORTH Queensland Cowboys prop Mitchell Sargent has been sacked from the NRL club after returning a positive test to cocaine.
The Daily Telegraph can reveal Sargent returned a positive in-house test to the recreational drug earlier this month. The Cowboys have torn up Sargent’s contract and his future in the NRL remains unclear. The Country Origin prop’s future remains unclear with the NRL expected to impose the mandatory two-year ban on Sargent. The NRL has been informed of the positive drug test and a spokesman said the Cowboys would issue a press release later today. Sargent is the first NRL player since’s Manly’s Andrew Walker in 2004 to test positive to a recreational drug. The positive drug test is the latest drama for the Cowboys who have slipped from grand finalists last year to missing the cut for the top eight in 2006.


http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegrap...001021,00.html

manlymania
24-08-2006, 06:24 PM
Thats wrong man.....i thought he never got the wraps he deserved and look what happens.

bradleythegreat
24-08-2006, 06:26 PM
he's 1 of the last guy i would expect

STORM_4EVA
24-08-2006, 06:31 PM
im so glad he aint at storm any more!!

Blakeb155
24-08-2006, 06:34 PM
geees... makes you think if any other players are doing drugs..

Hazem't got magic
24-08-2006, 06:36 PM
He probably does it to escape his under ratedness.

HugoTrorted
24-08-2006, 06:40 PM
Who really cares about sportsmen using recreational drugs. If they want to cut their careers and possibly their lives short by wrecking thier bodies with dangerous drugs, why can't they. as long as they're not performance enhancing

Prince_of_the_Sea
24-08-2006, 06:48 PM
geees... makes you think if any other players are doing drugs..
I can tell you right now some of the biggest names in the game have used recreational drugs at one time or another

Wogboy
24-08-2006, 07:17 PM
Sargent is a very good player, it is stupid how he had to do this. Hopefully he learns from it and signs with another club next year - hate to see him get a ban.

COWBOYS
24-08-2006, 07:24 PM
Damn what a loss:(.

Ritalindude
24-08-2006, 07:51 PM
He had whiteish hair.

Knights_Forever
24-08-2006, 08:05 PM
He Was In The Army (Get it Sargent LOL)

Ritalindude
24-08-2006, 08:09 PM
He Was In The Army (Get it Sargent LOL)
Lmao

sharkz_fanatic_99
24-08-2006, 08:19 PM
hes a canowindra boy, just like me. He is the last bloke id expect to be busted for cocaine.

MackTheKnife
24-08-2006, 08:43 PM
NRL Ban = ESL ban right?

CowboyGed
24-08-2006, 08:44 PM
i can't believe the cows dobbed him in if it was just an inhouse test. Lockyer's been found to have cocaine in his system at at least 2 in house bronco's tests that i know of.

MackTheKnife
24-08-2006, 08:53 PM
i can't believe the cows dobbed him in if it was just an inhouse test. Lockyer's been found to have cocaine in his system at at least 2 in house bronco's tests that i know of.

Yep, unless there was a previous test, I think going straight for "sacked, 2 year ban", basically kicking them out of their career, for an "in-house" test is pretty harsh.

Ritalindude
24-08-2006, 08:54 PM
i can't believe the cows dobbed him in if it was just an inhouse test. Lockyer's been found to have cocaine in his system at at least 2 in house bronco's tests that i know of.
Really? Whats your sauce?

CowboyGed
24-08-2006, 09:05 PM
Really? Whats your sauce?
i have people in the know. They have told me that he's stopped now but a few years ago he was on the coke pretty hard i hear.

MackTheKnife
24-08-2006, 09:08 PM
Really? Whats your sauce?

Tomato on most things, though I give BBQ and sweet chilli a workout occasionally.

Ritalindude
24-08-2006, 09:09 PM
Tomato on most things, though I give BBQ and sweet chilli a workout occasionally.
Yep Im a big Tomato fan too, BBQ is rather average.

MackTheKnife
24-08-2006, 09:11 PM
Yep Im a big Tomato fan too, BBQ is rather average.

Hey, if you ever have Tomato on a chicken sandwich or bread roll, do you find (I think its with hot and cold chicken) that the tomato sauce goes strange and sorta "glugs" the bread up?

Ritalindude
24-08-2006, 09:18 PM
Hey, if you ever have Tomato on a chicken sandwich or bread roll, do you find (I think its with hot and cold chicken) that the tomato sauce goes strange and sorta "glugs" the bread up?
Im not sure havent had a chicken sandiwch in ages. Anyone else had "gluggy" bread experiences? My theory is that the bread must soak up the sauce like a sponge and go weird.

Prince_of_the_Sea
24-08-2006, 09:20 PM
Im not sure havent had a chicken sandiwch in ages. Anyone else had "gluggy" bread experiences?
Yeah this one time at band camp' :D :D :D

MackTheKnife
24-08-2006, 09:54 PM
Im not sure havent had a chicken sandiwch in ages. Anyone else had "gluggy" bread experiences? My theory is that the bread must soak up the sauce like a sponge and go weird.

Well, I'm just about to eat chicken roll (roast chicken) and I'll get back to you.

MackTheKnife
24-08-2006, 10:04 PM
Okay, I guess it's bread, not breadroll, because there was no gluggy tomato.

paddy0000
24-08-2006, 10:28 PM
good they got rid of him.
anyone doing that should get the sack

bradleythegreat
24-08-2006, 10:34 PM
also by getting rid of him they clear some cap room
bring back rahihi!!!!

Illmatic
24-08-2006, 11:41 PM
Haha Sargent sucks anyways, he makes more metres going backwards then the referee

paddy*cowboy
24-08-2006, 11:47 PM
Haha Sargent sucks anyways, he makes more metres going backwards then the referee

You contribute nothing to these forums. Sargent is a great player who is underated my most. It is a shame that his carrer is virtually over now. he has one thing over you tho.

He has played first grade.

Roaddogg
25-08-2006, 12:08 AM
All you contribue is the admin sucking. I thought i told you not to talk to me, so dont. Oh by the way im really jealous about that, like i give a about some cocaine addic trying to be a footballer.


looks like its that time of the month

COWBOYS
25-08-2006, 12:11 AM
looks like its that time of the month

LOL

Here you go Illmatic

http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/7766/sanitarynapkinsuk9.jpg

Long Live User 1640
25-08-2006, 12:18 AM
To be perfectly honest, I like it when Illmatic gets in moods like this.

The only time we regularly see players get bagged is by biased idiots who try to compare them to their own players - or even worse, Queensland v NSW debates.

Illmatic provides honest and unbiased criticism of players that are, frankly, average first graders at best. It's refreshing from the biased tripe that we hear all the time and the ass-kissing of average players that also goes on quite a bit as well.

Sometimes players like Sargent that play a lot of first grade games for little recognition are under-rated, but most times they are just plain rubbish and don't deserve said recognition. Sargent was a "plodder" - he was very, very, very consistant, but he was consistantly an average first grader. He never had a shocker of a match but he was rarely in the top 10 players of a match either.

Illmatic
25-08-2006, 12:24 AM
Thanks champ im also sick of the so many bias supporters on this forum, cant avoid them

pimpsnz
25-08-2006, 12:26 AM
Well Well Well........................

paddy0000
25-08-2006, 12:44 AM
To be perfectly honest, I like it when Illmatic gets in moods like this.

The only time we regularly see players get bagged is by biased idiots who try to compare them to their own players - or even worse, Queensland v NSW debates.

Illmatic provides honest and unbiased criticism of players that are, frankly, average first graders at best. It's refreshing from the biased tripe that we hear all the time and the ass-kissing of average players that also goes on quite a bit as well.

Sometimes players like Sargent that play a lot of first grade games for little recognition are under-rated, but most times they are just plain rubbish and don't deserve said recognition. Sargent was a "plodder" - he was very, very, very consistant, but he was consistantly an average first grader. He never had a shocker of a match but he was rarely in the top 10 players of a match either.

yeah you and him are the best at doing that.

CowboyGed
25-08-2006, 01:17 AM
Just so everyone knows, because it was in house there is no 2 yr banning or anything like that. I'd say he'd look at super league.

Alec
25-08-2006, 02:16 AM
Just so everyone knows, because it was in house there is no 2 yr banning or anything like that. I'd say he'd look at super league.

Yep....he wasn't too great over here, but over there, he will be the best Super League player. :D

Eels_2006_Premiers
25-08-2006, 11:24 AM
He got what he deserved. You are not allowed to take drugs as an NRL player, especially cocaine. This should send out a clear message to all other NRL players of what the consequences are of taking drugs.

rolande
25-08-2006, 01:17 PM
Your not allowed to take them as a member of the public either, I'm very impressed with this crackdown despite being a cowboys supporter, I am very happy they are ironing out bad influences in the Rugby League community.

LuDa
25-08-2006, 01:49 PM
Your not allowed to take them as a member of the public either, I'm very impressed with this crackdown despite being a cowboys supporter, I am very happy they are ironing out bad influences in the Rugby League community.

You can never iron out the bad influences in the Rugby League Community. What you should be able to control is the stories in which the media choose to highlight just to sell papers. I would have thought that the tense ceasefire in Lebanon and Israel is more important than Mitchell Sargent failing an in-house drug test :rolleyes: However despite his admission, he won't be banned, because it was not a sanctioned or tested by the governing body therefore he is privy unto different rules. He will probably be picked up by some other NRL club next year. Maybe the Broncos

manlymania
25-08-2006, 02:08 PM
You can never iron out the bad influences in the Rugby League Community. What you should be able to control is the stories in which the media choose to highlight just to sell papers. I would have thought that the tense ceasefire in Lebanon and Israel is more important than Mitchell Sargent failing an in-house drug test :rolleyes: However despite his admission, he won't be banned, because it was not a sanctioned or tested by the governing body therefore he is privy unto different rules. He will probably be picked up by some other NRL club next year. Maybe the Broncos

it is but after a while that gets 'boring' to readers so a drug story from a representative NRL player is a big story.

LuDa
25-08-2006, 02:10 PM
it is but after a while that gets 'boring' to readers so a drug story from a representative NRL player is a big story.

War in the Middle East, Skyrocketing Fuel Prices, Misleading Election Promises, Water Crisis, Footballer Tests Positive to Cocaine, Industrial Relations Laws, Federal Police Numbers Influx....

manlymania
25-08-2006, 02:23 PM
War in the Middle East, Skyrocketing Fuel Prices, Misleading Election Promises, Water Crisis, Footballer Tests Positive to Cocaine, Industrial Relations Laws, Federal Police Numbers Influx....



yeah but all that other stuff but the football story is interesting.....all tose other topics you can read about ad nauseam.

LuDa
25-08-2006, 02:28 PM
yeah but all that other stuff but the football story is interesting.....all tose other topics you can read about ad nauseam.

True that. I was just appealing to the moral audience.....which is non-existant on this forum :D ;)

manlymania
25-08-2006, 02:54 PM
True that. I was just appealing to the moral audience.....which is non-existant on this forum :D ;)

fair enough;)